One percent continuation of existing sales tax defeated
By TOM GIAMBRONI, Staff WriterLISBON - It's a good thing county commissioners placed the sales tax on the ballot a year early given Tuesday's defeat of the measure.
Renewal of the 1 percent county sales tax for another five years was rejected by voters, 62.9 percent to 37.1 percent, in yesterday's election.
The tax actually expires Dec. 31, 2010, but commissioners placed it on the ballot a year early for a couple of reasons, one of which was to give them two more shots at getting it renewed next year before collection ceases.
"It's definitely going to go back on in May. We don't have a choice," said Commissioner Jim Hoppel. The 1 percent tax generates $8 million a year, accounting for 44 percent of county general fund revenue. "You can't make up that kind of money."
Both Hoppel and Commission Chairman Penny Traina believe confusion over the ballot language contributed to the tax's defeat. The recommended ballot language from the Ohio Secretary of State required the tax be referred to as being for "additional" revenue despite it being a renewal, leading some to believe it was a new tax.
"I'm just sick and obviously disappointed ... I think the ballot language could have had a negative effect," Traina said.
"Yes, it was misleading, and we are going to ask the secretary of state that (the ballot language) be changed" so they can use "renewal" or "continuation" the next time, Hoppel said.
Renewal of the sales tax has never been easy, and Traina said the fact voters are feeling the pinch from the recession may have also contributed to the tax's defeat. "I think the economics of our country had something to do with it," she said.
"I think that this board has worked well together and we've been good stewards of the taxpayer's money," she said.
Hoppel pointed out commissioners have lost $1 million in revenue this year due to a decline in sales tax collections and state cuts in county funding, "and we weren't asking for more money. We were making it work."
If voters fail to renew the sales tax next year, commissioners would be free to resume collecting 2-mills in property taxes. In 2000, commissioners agreed to cease collecting the 2 mills in exchange for voter passage of the tax. This would raise property taxes by $61 a year for the owner of a $100,000 home.
The 2 mills would generate only about $3 million a year, which is still far short of the $8 million the 1 percent sales tax generates.
There is also a second county sales tax in the amount of 0.5 percent, which was imposed by commissioners in early 2007 as a permanent measure.
|
WatchCat
|
|
|---|---|
|
11-04-09 5:17 PM
|
Hey WatchDoy, this is WatchCat..... Have you ever checked your grammer before you post a comment? Meow, Meow!!!
|
|
WatchDog
|
|
|
11-04-09 2:35 PM
|
And now those three conceited commissioners with their conceited rhectoric can now start looking for other jobs. They cooked their own gooses with that news article above. Only three politicians I know that could in one article, insult the intelligence of the voter, two slap us with a black mail theory of well we will get at least 3 million out of you one way or another and last but not least...pretend they have no clue as to why IT REALLY didn't pass!
|
|
WatchDog
|
|
|
11-04-09 2:26 PM
|
Improve and maintain what GOBLUE? When they were blessed with that first tax increase they didn't improve the economy and bring jobs to this area. They didn't put on extra deputies that they claimed they needed the money for. In fact it appears all they did was grab that extra 8 million year we gave them and blew every penny of it. Only county I know that can get blessed with that kind of revenue increase and went ahead like a bunch of lamebraind within a two year period and committed 16 million dollars into spenditures and have absolutely nothing to show for it now. Except a budget bound to that extra 8 million year debt. All in two years. These three commissioners just got held accountable by the voters at the polls. It was a no brainer. Now these three spendthrifts can go back to their budget and actually focus on it and quickly learn the term priority spending and cut the excess fat and start living within their means. LIKE EVERBODY ELSE IS DOING!
|
|
GOBLUE
|
|
|
11-04-09 11:01 AM
|
Companies will not want to move to a county that qualifies for the state's fiscal emergency or fiscal watch, or that charges more property millage. This was a tax that generated a penny for every dollar. It was collected on taxable items in that were bought in the county by people from other counties/states as well. How exactly are local officials supposed to improve the economy and bring jobs to this area if people do not care enough to at least maintain what we do have?
|
|
ts1227
|
|
|
11-04-09 7:32 AM
|
When anyone fails a RENEWAL that was not going to be permanent, they aren't smart... they're sad.
|
|
mynameis
|
|
|
11-04-09 2:00 AM
|
IMPROVE THE ECONOMY & JOBS TO THE AREA, THEN IT WILL PASS. NO JOBS, NO WAGE INCREASES, PEOPLE ARE NOW GETTING SMARTER.
|




