Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 hours ago.
by Kozy62
Kozy62
#1

We need a Change...

Considering "Hope and Change have failed, we need to find our next President from those running against Mr Obama. Even liberal commentators, such as Maureen Dowd are turning against the President as they recognize his lack of ability...

 
 

Member Comments

ABC News reports that the documents were heavily edited by the State Department. And not just edited, but censored: State requested that references to Ansar al-Sharia — tied to al Qaeda — be deleted. It also requested that references to CIA warnings about terror threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack be deleted as well.

Huge number of lies and high crimes and we demand a change!!

Posted 343 days ago.

Republicans, convinced that the American people are being hoodwinked by the Obama administration, have been digging through the doo-doo for eight months. There must be a conspiracy and cover-up.

The White House has scoffed, with the help of the bias media, at this hunt for months. But this week, it's looking like they're the ones standing in the doo-doo — playing politics, it seems, with tragedy.

The administration has long maintained that the now-infamous talking points used by U.N. Amb. Susan Rice on five Sunday talk shows just days after the September 11 attack were the product of the intelligence community. We know the talking points originated in the intelligence community. But the final product itself? No.

ABC News reports that the documents were heavily edited by the State Department. And not just edited, but censored: State requested that references to Ansar al-Sharia — tied to al Qaeda — be deleted. It also requested that references to CIA warnings about terror threat

Posted 343 days ago.

These are high crimes and Obama should be impeached...

The White House provided the emails to members of the House and Senate intelligence committees for a limited time and with the stipulation that the documents were available for review only and would not be turned over to the committees. The White House and committee leadership agreed to that arrangement as part of a deal that would keep Republican senators from blocking the confirmation of John Brennan, the president’s choice to run the CIA. If the House report provides an accurate and complete depiction of the emails, it is clear that senior administration officials engaged in a wholesale rewriting of intelligence assessments about Benghazi in order to mislead the public.

Posted 349 days ago.

Obama blames American guns for Mexican deaths: ‘Most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come from the United States’

The president omitted mention of Operation Fast and Furious, his Department of Justice’s program that ‘walked’ thousands of guns across the border.

Obama will lie to anyone at any time. He has not only failed but is an embarrassment and should just resign.

Posted 350 days ago.

4/23/13: Legislation that would empower states to tax online purchases cleared a key hurdle in the Senate on Monday after winning an enthusiastic endorsement from President Obama.

Stop the madness. Right now thousands upon thousands need jobs and Washington, especially the President, cannot stay away from added taxes.

Posted 361 days ago.

How do you know the jobs report is a bad one? Well, when CNBC titles their article “US Jobs Creation Plunges, but Rate Drops to 7.6%” while the ticker above it reads “Stocks Tumble 1% after Dismal Jobs Report, Dow Skids 150,” you know it can’t be great. Sure, the unemployment rate fell .1% all the way down to 7.6%, but the US economy only created 88,000 jobs. The dropping unemployment rate is simply an effect of the shrinking size of the labor force.

This is criminal...this President has gone on three vacations and a long fund raising trip while Americans suffer. He should be impeached!

Posted 379 days ago.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama’s decision to launch his own political organization has some Democrats wondering: Is he just in it for himself?

Obama’s new group, Organizing for Action, will focus on his policy agenda – not on electing Democratic candidates – by raising unlimited amounts of cash and accessing the president’s secret list of 20 million supporters, volunteers and donors.

Are democrats going to finally see him for what he is? We need a change asap...

Posted 382 days ago.

notSocialist

Been watching the show 'The Walking Dead'. I thought it was about the people who voted for Obama the 2nd time. Turns out it's about zombies.

Posted 383 days ago.

The Biblical celebration of Passover was Monday and President Obama gave a message at the White House in honor of the celebration. Of course, being the narcissist he is, he had to mention himself 7 times by using an I statement in a scant 269 word message. That is one mention of himself every 38 words. That ladies and gentlemen, is our Narcissist-In-Chief...

Isn't there something elsewhere that would make him feel more important and he just quit being our President...we need a change!

Posted 387 days ago.

Tom Coburn

The Senate just passed my budget amendment #412 by a voice vote to end special discounts for political parties at the Post Office. Political entities should not be receiving discounts that deprive the cash-strapped Postal Service of sorely needed revenue.

Thank you Tom...we need so much more but everything helps.

Posted 392 days ago.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama came into office four years ago skeptical of pushing the power of the White House to the limit, especially if it appeared to be circumventing Congress.

Now, as he launches his second term, Obama has grown more comfortable wielding power to try to move his own agenda forward.

This has to stop! No American, should want one person with that much power...it has to stop!

Posted 395 days ago.

Senate Democrats on Wednesday, March 13th, officially unveiled a budget resolution for the first time in nearly four years. It presents a stark contrast to the latest offering by House Republicans, which achieves balance within a decade without raising taxes. The Democratic proposal never balances, and calls for a $1 trillion tax increase, at least $100 billion in stimulus spending, and a smattering of nebulous spending cuts, most of which can be chalked up to accounting gimmicks.

Now that Senate Democrats have finally put their plan on paper, it is not hard to understand why they have been so reluctant to do so. For one, it is far easier to demagogue an opponent’s proposal without a serious plan of your own to defend. In almost all respects, the Democratic budget is a political testament to President Obama’s insistence that “we don’t have an immediate crisis in terms of debt.”

Democrats, especially liberals, need to be replaced asap.

Posted 400 days ago.

Stroke of genius? More of a display of genius. Couldn't wait to witness this man of conscience and statesmanship.

I've been having an absolute blast with the liberals over at an overwhelmingly liberal blog, and I can't believe how quickly they accept Eric Holder's rationale toward the use of drones against American citizens in America.

I'm thinking to myself, are these the same people that were horrified over FISA court warrants for wiretapping transnational calls?

If the President can use a drone against American citizens, could he not instead send an assassin? What's the difference?

Posted 408 days ago.

Thank you Mr. Obama for creating a financial disaster. There is now no doubt that you want us to suffer.

Posted 411 days ago.

Tom Coburn: "Like a maxed-out credit card, more debt for the federal government means more interest to be paid: rising to $857 billion in a decade."

So why is Tom the only one crying from the roof tops? We need to change to a fiscally sound Federal government...yep, we need a change...

Posted 437 days ago.

This is completely out of control and needs to be changed...There’s nothing moderate or incremental about the increase in federal regulations — and hence in centralized executive power — under President Obama. To the contrary, according to figures published by the Obama White House, the costs of regulations issued by this administration have dwarfed the costs of regulations issued by prior administrations.

In fact, as the chart below shows, the costs of “major” regulations — those estimated to cost at least $100 million in any one year (in 2001 dollars) — issued by the Obama administration in its first three years nearly tripled the cost of those issued by the Clinton administration in its first three years, nearly quintupled the cost of those issued by the George W. Bush administration in its first three years, and nearly doubled the cost of those issued by Bush and Clinton combined. Again, that’s according to the Obama White House’s own tallies.

Posted 443 days ago.

What will you do if Obama steps upon the Constitution and puts gun control measures in place by executive order? Anyone sorry yet that they voted for him?

Posted 459 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or