Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | Home RSS
 
 
 

A just-released Associated Press poll has President Obama's overall job approval at its lowest ever point — 37 percent. Do you agree he is doing an unsatisfactory job?

  1. Yes
  2. No
 
 
 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(225)

notSocialist

Oct-24-13 6:56 AM

"FARGO – The Obama administration asked North Dakota’s largest health insurer not to publicize how many people have signed up for health insurance through a new online exchange, a company official says.

During a Monday forum in Fargo for people interested in signing up for coverage via the exchange, James Nichol of Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota told the crowd his company received the request from the federal government earlier Monday. Nichol is a consumer sales manager for the company.

Still, a spokeswoman from Blue Cross Blue Shield says about 14 North Dakotans have signed up for coverage since the federal exchange went live Oct. 1. That brings total statewide enrollment to 20 – less than one a day. "

14 enrolled in 20 days! Hahahahahahahaha!

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Kozy62

Oct-24-13 4:31 AM

More Americans Lose Health Insurance Than Sign Up for ObamaCare Plans

Since August, more than half a million Americans have received notices from the health insurers that their existing policies are being canceled because they don’t comply with the Affordable Care Act, reports Kaiser. And that’s just for a handful of insurers in a handful of states. Florida Blue has canceled 300k policies in Florida, or about 80 percent of its individual policies in the state, and Kaiser Permanente has canceled 160k policies in California, about half of its individual policies there. On Bloomberg, Megan McArdle asks, “Is ObamaCare in a Death Spiral?” And Politico reports the WH has called a quick meeting with the nation’s top health insurance executives.

So, will Obama finally agree that the American people and the Republican's were correct...do pigs fly?

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

notSocialist

Oct-23-13 7:46 AM

"Do you notice a pattern...a problem is either someone else's fault or the President knows nothing. "

Half right... the President knows nothing.

I hope next time we get a LEADER. Obama is a hider.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

notSocialist

Oct-23-13 7:44 AM

Republicans have filed a FOI to get the numbers on ObamaKare sign-up from the Administration, since Obama will not allow the numbers to be released.

I think we all know why they are hiding the tally....

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Kozy62

Oct-23-13 6:43 AM

Sebelius: "Obama Did Not Know About Obamacare Website Glitches"

Do you notice a pattern...a problem is either someone else's fault or the President knows nothing. I would be ashamed to back any person who responded that way, and of course it is showing an illness and he needs medical help.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Kozy62

Oct-23-13 6:39 AM

Today's Headlines...what do you think?

"TAX DOLLARS FOR NFL TEAM TO PROMOTE OBAMACARE"...

"Man Spends 4.5 Hours on Phone But Still Can't Sign Up"...

"Iowan Enrolls After Over 100 Attempts"...

"Spanish website completely down"...

"HHS Finds TWO Enrollees for Ads"...

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Kozy62

Oct-22-13 10:39 AM

True, concerned...just trying to keep it as simple as possible.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

concerned

Oct-22-13 8:36 AM

Kozy your figures on ss are correct if the average worker made $30,000 but the fact most haven't. I remember back in the 60's when $5 an hr that GM was paying was big bucks. I agree though if the fund would have been left alone it would be much more solvent today. I think the COLA's that were instituted sometime in the 60's was something else that accelerated the depletion of the ss fund. In fact cola's for all government wage earners are adding to the spending of money that the government don't have and it just fans inflation, which I have said countless times, that inflation is the poor man's biggest enemy.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

concerned

Oct-22-13 8:22 AM

Obamacare is forcing insurance carriers to cover things that some people don't want covered,starting next year. Add to that that they will have to accept people that they normally would not have to take and it spells considerable rate increases. Then to add insult to injury the law brings all kinds of taxes on people that buy health insurance, the companies that sell ins. and health providers and manufacturers of medical supplies and that just adds more cost to the consumer to get coverage. The cost increase are just starting wait till this thing gets into full swing. It may mean a fatal blow to the health care industry as we know it.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Kozy62

Oct-22-13 8:10 AM

And after the election and the budget fights...

It took a while, but NBC has finally admitted what has been obvious to millions of us for a couple of years now: Obamacare causes people to lose their health insurance.

From NBC: Health plans are sending hundreds of thousands of cancellation letters to people who buy their own coverage, frustrating some consumers who want to keep what they have and forcing others to buy more costly policies.

…the cancellation notices, which began arriving in August, have shocked many consumers in light of President Obama’s promise that people could keep their plans if they liked them.

“I don’t feel like I need to change, but I have to,” said Jeff Learned, a television editor in Los Angeles, who must find a new plan for his teenage daughter, who has a health condition that has required multiple surgeries.

An estimated 14 million people purchase their own coverage because they don’t get it through their jobs. Calls to insurers in several stat

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

concerned

Oct-22-13 8:02 AM

I think one could safely say playing the role of the policeman of the world, is what has put this country in the tank. You would think we would learn our lesson and mind our own business.

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Kozy62

Oct-22-13 7:36 AM

BTW, to answer my own question:

In 1969 the Johnson admin. began counting Social Security funds in the federal budget. This was done for political purposes.

By adding Social Security funds into the federal budget instead of keeping those funds separate as per the original legislation in 1935 the deficit spending on the very unpopular Vietnam war could be made to appear less troubling. Wars cost money & Vietnam was costing a bunch. Traditionally taxes or a special tax would be levied to pay for war expenses. But because Vietnam was so unpopular Johnson & the democrats didn't dare propose a war tax on anybody. Instead he borrowed the money to support the war & ran high deficits which were added directly to the National Debt. In other words, he ran up the balance on the nation's credit card & made the cost of the war appear to be less by adding into the budget the Social Security collections.

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

notSocialist

Oct-22-13 7:19 AM

HEADLINE: Jon Stewart’s Scathing Obamacare Critique Is as Ruthlessly Honest as It Is Funny

(some language)

theblaze. com/stories/2013/10/22/jon-stewarts-scathing-obamacare-critique-is-as-ruthlessly-honest-as-it-is-funny/

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

notSocialist

Oct-22-13 7:18 AM

Great posts, Kozy!

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Kozy62

Oct-22-13 7:17 AM

Gallup...PRINCETON, NJ -- President Barack Obama averaged a 44.5% job approval rating during his 19th quarter in office, a decline of more than three percentage points from his 18th quarter. That is one of the largest quarter-to-quarter declines of his presidency, behind a nine-point drop in his third quarter and a six-point drop in his 11th quarter.

Any wonder why, considering the scandals and lies...?

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Kozy62

Oct-22-13 7:12 AM

...(Continued)...Entitlement my foot, I paid cash for my social security insurance! Just because President Johnson and the democrats borrowed the money for other government spending, doesn't make my benefits some kind of charity or handout!

Remember Congressional benefits? --- free healthcare, outrageous retirement packages, 67 paid holidays, three weeks paid vacation, unlimited paid sick days. Now that's welfare, and they call social security retirement payments entitlements?

Why did the Johnson and the democrats borrow from it in the first place? Did they do it because it was good for us? It was never supposed to be part of the general fund...now, anyone want to discuss Medicare?

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Kozy62

Oct-22-13 7:08 AM

...(Continued)...If you calculate the future invested value of $4,500 per year (yours & your employer's contribution) at a simple 5% interest (less than what the Government pays on the money that it borrows), after 49 years of working you'd have $892,919.98.

If you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $26,787.60 per year and it would last better than 30 years (until you're 95 if you retire at age 65) and that's with no interest paid on that balance after each payout is made! If you bought an annuity and it paid 4% per year, you'd have a lifetime income of $2,976.40 per month...(Continued)...

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Kozy62

Oct-22-13 7:03 AM

Yesterday, I heard "AGAIN" from a liberal member of congress how we recipient's of social security were getting entitlements...well, lets do some math:

Social Security...

Not only did you and I contribute to Social Security but your employer did, too. It totaled 15% of your income before taxes. If you averaged only $30K over your working life, that's close to $220,500.

Read that again. Did you see where the Government paid in one single penny? We are talking about the money you and your employer put in a Government bank to insure we would have a retirement check from the money we put in, not the Government.

Now they are calling the money we put in an entitlement when we reach the age to take it back...(Continued)...

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

notSocialist

Oct-22-13 6:35 AM

Wouldn't it be nice iff all insurance worked like ObummaKare?

Wreck your car, Then go out and get insurance to cover it.

House burns down, Then go get insurance to cover it.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

notSocialist

Oct-22-13 6:31 AM

Off topic alert!

Of all the fishes in the stream, I like best but the bass.

He climbs upon the rocks and rills and slides down on his little..

hands and knees.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

notSocialist

Oct-22-13 6:30 AM

"I'm gonna echo Grant here. The word in that website is okay, but h e r o i n gets bleeped? "

I can't figure it either, except that it means child of unwed parents, and is a legitimate word.

I couldn't substitute 'fish-poo' in this case as the link wouldn't work.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

notSocialist

Oct-22-13 6:26 AM

Still can't find the truth, eh, 3D? I never said Alinsky was a socialist, I said his 'Rules for Radicals' is the American socialist/commmunist/Democrat playbook.

Keep trying, even monkeys can get it right eventually.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TripleD

Oct-21-13 6:10 PM

notSocialist, You have been drinking too much of the koolaide. I never heard of Saul Alinski until the right wing tried to use it to smear the President. The irony is that even the right wing has no idea who Saul Alinski was. They just like using the sound of his Russian name even though he was born in Chicago, Illinois in 1909 to Russian Jewish immigrant parents.

Saul David Alinsky (January 30, 1909 – June 12, 1972) was an American community organizer and writer. He is generally considered to be the founder of modern community organizing. The man was not a communist much to the disappointment of the right wing.

0 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

questioner

Oct-21-13 10:46 AM

Hey, someone at Salem News:

I'm gonna echo Grant here. The word in that website is okay, but h e r o i n gets bleeped?

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Kozy62

Oct-21-13 7:29 AM

TripleD: "." You mean like the rabid nonsense you posted in reference to god,"

My friend, God just loves you and whether you choose to believe or not is up to you. The Bible is clear that those who do not believe do not understand...so you are right when you say to you it makes no sense. I will just keep praying that one day, you will understand.

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 225 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web